Legal Opinion

Arthur Dale Jack v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1969No. 23171PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLIN, Circuit Judge:

In an indictment found by the Grand Jury in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Lee and Doty were charged with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) (d) (armed bank robbery), and Arthur Dale Jack, appellant herein, was charged with aiding and abetting Lee and Doty in the commission of such crime (18 U.S.C. § 2). Prior to Jack’s trial Lee and Doty confessed to the crime, and each pleaded guilty. Appellant pleaded not guilty and was convicted after a jury trial. A timely appeal was filed in this court, which has jurisdiction under 28…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Dennis Henry Loraine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Lafayette Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Pete Johnson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Alfred Joseph SamangoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  2. United States v. William Erness Thoresen, United States of America v. Louise Banich ThoresenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. SklaroffDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1971
  4. United States v. Howard Jackson, Jr., United States of America v. Billy Joe Payne, United States of America v. Robert H. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. United States v. Michael S. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API