Legal Opinion

United States v. Adolpho Rodriquez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1971No. 25489_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

Adolpho Rodriquez appeals from his conviction on all counts of an eleven-count indictment charging a conspiracy to import and sell heroin, and concealment, facilitating the concealment, sale, facilitating the sale and facilitating the transportation of heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 174. The only issue raised on appeal which we find worthy of discussion, is whether, as defendant argues, the trial court erred in giving an inadequate and improper instruction on defendant’s defense of entrapment.

The instruction given was erroneous under Notaro v. United States, 363…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Rudy Notaro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  2. Samuel Jacento Ortega v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Eddie Javor, Alan H. Rice and Lawrence S. Toroker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  4. Dwight Dewitt Robison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  5. William Nordeste v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Anthony J. Demma, United States of America v. Henry BrulayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. State v. McNultyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  4. United States v. Jerry Lee HendricksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. United States v. George ShameiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API