Legal Opinion

Janice Curry v. Eaton Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 20, 2010No. 08-5973, 08-6369UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, Janice F. Curry (“Curry”) appeals from two orders of the district court: one granting summary judgment to Eaton Corporation and Broadspire Services, Inc. (“Eaton” and “Broadspire,” respectively) in her ERISA denial-of-benefits claim, and one denying her subsequent Motion to Alter, Amend, or Vacate that summary judgment order. The appellees have appealed the district court’s decision to extend the time permitted to Curry to file her notice of appeal.

Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in analyzing the considerations relevant to granting a motion…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Connor v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  2. Zenadocchio v. BAE Systems Unfunded Welfare Benefit PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Adams v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  4. Tanner v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  5. Temponeras v. United States Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2016

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API