Legal Opinion
Poweragent Inc., a California Corporation v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2004No. 19-35565PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
PowerAgent Inc. (“PowerAgent”) appeals the district court’s orders striking its Amended Complaint and confirming an arbitration award in favor of Electronic Data Systems Corp. (“EDS”). Because Power-Agent itself argued that the arbitration panel should independently determine the arbitrability of all its claims and fails to provide a sufficient basis to vacate the arbitration award, we affirm.
I
PowerAgent’s initial complaint in district court alleged that EDS breached several interrelated contracts — a Services Agreement and two investment agreements— and committed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Lawrence Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, an Illinois Corporation David's Restaurant SupplyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Matthews v. National Football League Management CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Schoenduve Corporation, a California Corporation v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.