Legal Opinion
Schoenduve Corporation, a California Corporation v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 22, 2006No. 04-15529PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Lucent Technologies (“Lucent”) appeals the district court’s order confirming an arbitration award entered in favor of Schoenduve Corporation (“Schoenduve”). Lucent asks this Court to vacate or modify the arbitration award claiming that the arbitrator (1) exceeded his authority by ruling on an issue not submitted by the parties, (2) modified or expanded the unambiguous language of the agreement requiring arbitration, and (3) failed to provide Lucent an opportunity to rebut Schoenduve’s claim for commissions under a quasi-contract or estoppel theory. Lu-cent also asks us…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Waffle House, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Antonio R. Leyva v. Certified Grocers of California, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Catherine Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Lagstein v. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS, LLOYD'S, LONDONCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States Life Insurance v. Superior National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. DrewDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Gueyffier v. Ann Summers, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 2008
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.