State v. Hulsman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hon. Jesse A. Miller, Judge. The defendant was tried on an indictment charging him with perjury. He appeals from a judgment on a verdict of guilty.
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
The defendant claimed to be the owner of several cases of shoes which had been levied upon as the property of S. E. Carter, and served a notice of such ownership on the sheriff as provided by section 3991 of the Code, whereupon the goods were released from the levy. The court instructed that a conviction would be warranted if *573the jury found that at the time the defendant signed and swore 'to the notice and at the time he delivered it to the sheriff, he knew that he was not the owner of the shoes, and knew that he had not bought them of Carter and paid therefor the sum alleged therein to have…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Reiley v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- State ex rel. Braley v. GaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- State v. GallaugherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- People v. ParentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
- Dalbey Bros. Lumber Co. v. CrispinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Bundren v. Car Connection, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.