Legal Opinion

Bundren v. Car Connection, Inc.

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1998No. 91163PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Vice Chief Judge.

¶ 1 Plaintiffs/Appellants Larry and Shirley Bundren bought a 1989 Mercury Cougar automobile from Defendant/Appellee Car Connection, Inc. [Car Connection] in March, 1996. Eight months later they sued Car Connection and its bond issuer1 alleging the car did not have a window sticker displayed as required by state and federal law. Appellants further alleged that they took the car to a mechanic shortly after buying it and were told that it had been “severely wrecked and damaged” prior to sale, that Car Connection knew about the damage but failed to disclose…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Collins Radio Co. of Dallas v. BellCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1981
  3. State v. WalkerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  4. Morris v. MacK's Used CarsTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Koperski v. Husker Dodge, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Savage v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  2. Savage v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Savage v. BurtonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API