Legal Opinion

People v. Parent

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1903No. Crim. No. 950PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

Defendant was convicted of perjury,'1' moved for a new trial, and in arrest of judgment, and from the orders denying them both appeals.

Appellant and six others were on trial in the superior court of Madera County, jointly charged with “an assault by means and force likely to do bodily harm upon one W. C. Sellars.” At that trial the charge against appellant was dismissed, and he was called as a witness for the prosecution, and it is upon his testimony given as such witness that this charge of perjury is predicated.

Two grounds are urged for reversal. It is insisted,—1. That the alleged oath…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The People v. . CookNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  2. Lewis v. DunneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. SwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CasanovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. State v. HulsmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API