Legal Opinion
Cruz Rendon v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 3, 2010No. 19-35130PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION
FOGEL, District Judge:
OPINION
Petitioner Araceli Cruz Rendon (“Cruz Rendon”), a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the denial of her application for cancellation of removal by the Immigration Judge (“IJ”). Cruz Rendon claims that the “exceptional and extremely unusual hardship” requirement of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution, and that the IJ denied her a full and fair hearing in violation of the Due Process Clause. We have jurisdiction…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gil Ilano Colmenar,petitioner v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- BURBANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1994
- Ukashu Nuru, AKA Ukasha Nuru v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Almaz Sayoum Abebe Sisay Mengistu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Rosaura Sola v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Gonzaga-Ortega v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Elen Grigoryan v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Sylvester Owino v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Francisco Garfias-Rodriguez v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.