Legal Opinion
BURBANO
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 1994No. ID 3229PublishedCited by 360 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Interim Decision #3229 MATTER OF BURRANO In Deportation Proceedings A-38045964 Decided by Board September 13, 1994 (1) When the Board of Immigration Appeals reviews a discretionary determination of an immigration judge, it relies upon its own independent judgment in deciding the ultimate disposition of the case. (2) The Board does not have a de facto policy of denying relief under section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(c) (Supp. V 1993), to all aliens convicted of a serious drug offense; however, a serious drug crime will be accorded duo weight, as is…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Rigoberto Yepes-Prado v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Jhonny A. Huaman-Cornelio v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- CERNABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1991
- Jesus Jorge Ayala-Chavez v. U.S. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- PULABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by360 opinions
- Almaz Sayoum Abebe Sisay Mengistu v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Parussimova v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Xin Jie Xie v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Chenthilkumaran Senathirajah v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Husyev v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
355 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.