Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Thornton

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1985No. 15851PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal, pursuant to I.A.R. 12(b), from a decision by the Industrial Commission that claimant-respondent Martha Burdick was an employee of defendant-appellant Larry Thornton, dba T-5 Quarter Horses, rather than an independent contractor. We affirm this interlocutory decision of the Commission and remand this case for further proceedings to determine the extent of workmen’s compensation benefits to which claimant is entitled.

Burdick came to work for T-5 Quarter Horses as a horse trainer soon after her graduation from a Wyoming college with a degree in equestrian…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ledesma v. BergesonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Beutler v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Fitzen v. Cream Top DairyIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Burns v. NybergIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Wernecke v. St. Maries Joint School District 401Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Mortimer v. Riviera ApartmentsIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Sines v. SinesIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API