Legal Opinion

Ledesma v. Bergeson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1978No. 12436PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONALDSON, Justice.

Claimant-respondent Dominga Ledesma filed her claim with the Industrial Commission seeking workmen’s compensation benefits for the death of her husband which allegedly occurred while he was employed by the defendant-appellant Travis Bergeson. Her husband, Anastacio Ledesma, had been a farm laborer for a number of years in the Blackfoot area.

The defendant-appellant, Travis Bergeson, is a farmer in Dayton, Idaho.’ He contracted with Ledesma and his crew in August of 1974 to harvest his cabbage. Bergeson had employed Ledesma before and knew of his reputation as a good worker.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Duffy Reed Construction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Anderson v. GaileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Pinson Ex Rel. Pinson v. Minidoka Highway DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Madron v. Green Giant CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co. of IdahoIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Burdick v. ThorntonIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Olvera v. Del's Auto BodyIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Shriner v. RauschIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Burns v. NybergIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API