Legal Opinion
Sandy Springs Toyota v. Classic Cadillac Atlanta Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 3, 2004No. A04A1504PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Chief Judge.
Sandy Springs Toyota (SST) brought suit against Classic Cadillac Atlanta Corporation (Classic) after losing a used car sale because the car, which was originally purchased at Classic, had a defective title. The trial court granted Classic’s motion for judgment on the pleadings based upon the affirmative defense of expiration of the applicable statutes of limitation, and SST appeals. Because we agree with the trial court that SST’s causes of action were barred by statutes of limitation, we affirm.
The record shows that the dispute between the parties concerns a 1996 Cadillac…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hardaway Co. v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade & Douglas, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Morris v. JohnstoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- U-Haul Co. v. Abreu & Robeson, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Larkins v. BoydSupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Department of Transportation v. Fru-Con Construction Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thornton v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Tiismann v. Linda Martin Homes Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Cook v. Knight (In re Knight)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Tuttle v. Board of Regents of the University SystemCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Howell v. Fulford (In re Southern Home & Ranch Supply, Inc. )United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.