Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 28, 2010No. S09G1257PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAHMIAS, Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the one-year time-to-sue clause in the parties’ insurance policy was not tolled for at least 60 days after Lagrande Thornton submitted a proof of loss, which is the minimum period the policy gave to Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company (GFB) to pay after receiving proof of loss. See Thornton v. Georgia Farm Bureau Mut. Ins. Co., 297 Ga. App. 132 (676 SE2d 814) (2009). This is a case of straightforward contract interpretation, and we affirm.

Thornton, whose home was destroyed…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Devillers v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'nMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Peloso v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
  4. Tom Thomas Organization, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. StatonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  2. Langley v. Mp Spring Lake, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  3. Ricardo White v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Ayers v. Association of County Commissioners of Georgia-Interlocal Risk Management AgencyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  5. Thompson v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2017

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API