Legal Opinion

Lambert v. City of Bridgeport

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 4, 1987No. 13095PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, a retired, heart-disabled police officer, is entitled to collect benefits under both a private retirement plan with his employer and General Statutes § 7-433C,1 even though the combined payment would *565exceed the maximum salary being paid to active patrol officers. The trial court held that the plaintiff could collect both benefits and the defendants have appealed. 2 We find no error.

The parties stipulated to the following facts. Prior to December 13, 1975, the defendant city of Bridgeport employed the plaintiff as a regular member of its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  2. Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  4. Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
  5. City of Middletown v. Local Union No. 1073 of International Ass'n of FirefightersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Felia v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Carriero v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  3. Maturo v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
  4. Zaleta v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Costello v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API