Lambert v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, a retired, heart-disabled police officer, is entitled to collect benefits under both a private retirement plan with his employer and General Statutes § 7-433C,1 even though the combined payment would *565exceed the maximum salary being paid to active patrol officers. The trial court held that the plaintiff could collect both benefits and the defendants have appealed. 2 We find no error.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. Prior to December 13, 1975, the defendant city of Bridgeport employed the plaintiff as a regular member of its…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Maciejewski v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Town of Plainville v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Chieppo v. Robert E. McMichael, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Panico v. Sperry Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- City of Middletown v. Local Union No. 1073 of International Ass'n of FirefightersConnecticut Appellate Court · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Felia v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Carriero v. Borough of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Maturo v. State Employees Retirement CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Zaleta v. Town of FairfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- Costello v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.