Legal Opinion
State v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 17, 1931No. 28,452PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis finding it guilty of a violation of G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) § 5814, by selling at its retail store in said city a bottle of medicine without having a licensed pharmacist in charge of such sales or employed in said store.
Section 5814 is a part of the pharmacy law of this state, now G. S. 1923 (1 Mason, 1927) §§ 5797-5816, inclusive. Section 5805 defines drugs, medicines, and poisons, for the purposes of the law’, as “all substances commonly kept in drug stores and used in compounding medicines or sold for…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Noel v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
- State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. ChildsArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- State Board of Pharmacy v. . MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. WakeenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
- Cady v. KerrWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Proprietary Ass'n v. Bd. of Pharmacy of NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Lyons v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.