Legal Opinion
State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 25, 1958No. 37,322PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County denying the motions of the plaintiff and intervenor for amended findings of fact and conclusions of law or in the alternative for a new trial.
The complaints of the State of Minnesota seek to restrain the defendant corporations and certain of their officers from the alleged violation of certain provisions of M. S. A. c. 151 relating to the subject of pharmacy (L. 1937, c. 354, and amendments). The complaint against the Red Owl Stores, Inc., alleges that it operates a large number of retail food markets;…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fitchette v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- State v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- State v. HovorkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- State v. ZenoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Turner v. United-Buckingham Freight Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State Board of Medical Examiners v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- State v. Red Owl Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Loblaw, Inc. v. New York State Board of PharmacyNew York Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.