In Re Prudential Securities Inc. Ltd. Partnerships Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND DECISION RE FEES AND EXPENSES
MILTON POLLACK, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
By orders dated August 1, 1997 this Court finally approved the terms of the settlement, between plaintiffs and the Polaris Defen dants, 1 which is embodied in the Stipulation of Settlement With Polaris Defendants (the “Settlement”), dated April 22, 1997. The Settlement provided, among other things, that the Polaris Defendants would pay $22,-500,000 into a settlement fund for the benefit of the PAIF Subclass (the “Class”). The Class was certified by court order dated June 5, 1997. 2 The Preliminary…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Class Chemical Bank, in Its Representative Capacity as Trustee for Bondholders, and Bernstein, Litowitz, Berger & Grossman Milberg, Weiss, Bershad, Specthrie & Lerach Molloy, Jones & Donahue, P.C. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Lawrence Laub v. Continental Assurance Company v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power Administration, Class and Continental Assurance Company v. Berger & Montague, P.A. v. City of Seattle Oregon Public Entities, Benton Rural Electric Association, Washington Washington Public Power Supply System R.W. Beck and Associates Ebasco Services Incorporated United Engineers & Constructors, Inc. Director Participants' Committee Public Utility District No. 1, of Klickitat County United States of America, on Behalf of Itself and Its Agency, the Bonneville Power Administration State of Washington Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Continental Illinois Securities Litigation v. Continental Illinois CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Paul, Johnson, Alston & Hunt v. GraultyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Telik, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Sunbeam Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2001
- Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- In re Bausch & Lomb, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Loudermilk Services, Inc. v. Marathon Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009