Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Moshe v. Norick
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 26, 1999No. 93,273PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Justice,
¶ 1 Appellants, Tal and the association calling itself “T.A.R.,” dismissed most of the defendants named in the style of this appeal. The only remaining defendants, appellees here, are the former Mayor of Oklahoma City, Ron Norick, in his official capacity, The City of Oklahoma City, the Oklahoma City Public Property Authority, and the Oklahoma City Athletic Club. The trial court granted the motions to dismiss of the remaining defendants, the City and its former May- or, the Public Property Authority, and the Athletic Club. Tal and T.A.R. appeal. Appel-lees moved that this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Burks v. American Nat. Bank of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
3Cited by17 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.