Legal Opinion
City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 1, 1999No. 92,874PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WATT, Justice.
¶ 1 This is an appeal from thé order of the District Court of Oklahoma County, Honorable Karl Gray, District Judge, denying the motion to intervene and motion for continuance of Moshe Tal and others, who call themselves “an association known as Taxpayers Against Ripoffs (T.A.R.’).” Appellants appeal from the trial court’s order. Tal is an unsuccessful bidder for the Redevelopment Agreements on the MAPS Briektown Redevelopment Project, which Agreements were ultimately awarded to appellees, Briektown Parking Investors and TMK/Hogan.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brimmer v. ThomsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1974
- Application of GoodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Miller v. State Board of EducationIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
- Gordon v. FollowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Whelan v. New Jersey Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Tal v. HoganCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- House of Realty, Inc. v. City of Midwest CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- Tulsa Industrial Authority v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.