Carroll v. El Dorado Estates Division Number Two Ass'n
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
In this case an incorporated association of condominium owners brought suit to enforce a bylaw of the association which bans residential possession of animals, i.e., pets. The court granted summary judgment in the association’s favor.
We find that the bylaw was not validly adopted and we reverse.
I
The El Dorado Estates Division Number Two Association, Inc. [Association] was established pursuant to a condominium declaration 1 filed in 1976. The Association is a corporation which, through its Board of Directors, manages the business affairs of the condominium property on behalf of the unit…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Morrow v. New Moon Homes, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Rego v. DeckerAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Cousineau v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Blum v. LatterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- Klein v. Scranton Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Dunlap v. Bavarian Village Condominium Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Carroll v. EL DORADO ESTATES DIV. NO. 2 ASS'NAlaska Supreme Court · 1984