Legal Opinion

Walton v. Bank of California, National Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1963No. Civ. 20793PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in this action brought by her to rescind an irrevocable inter vivos trust. Additionally, plaintiff appeals from an order denying her motion to tax costs. We have concluded that the evidence is sufficient to support the findings and that the judgment should be affirmed. However, as we shall hereafter explain, we are of the view that the denial of plaintiff’s motion to tax costs should be reversed.

We set forth the following pertinent facts in accordance with the familiar rule that an appellate court will view the evidence in the light most favorable to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Teel v. GaskillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Berniker v. BernikerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Gherman v. ColburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Grant v. FritzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
  3. McLellan v. McLellanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Marshall v. MarshallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Kanner v. Globe Bottling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API