Goodrich v. Alfred
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action originally upon the common connts, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County where two substituted complaints filed by the plaintiff were successively stricken out by the court, first by Studley, J"., and later by Hubbard, Jupon motion of the defendant; subsequently the plaintiff was nonsuited by the court, Hubbard, J., for failure to file a bill of particulars or proper substitute complaint, from which judgment he appealed for alleged errors in the…
Read the full summary
Action originally upon the common connts, brought to the Court of Common Pleas in New Haven County where two substituted complaints filed by the plaintiff were successively stricken out by the court, first by Studley, J"., and later by Hubbard, Jupon motion of the defendant; subsequently the plaintiff was nonsuited by the court, Hubbard, J., for failure to file a bill of particulars or proper substitute complaint, from which judgment he appealed for alleged errors in the rulings of the court. Twentyr-six days after the first “substituted complaint” was struck from the files, which was several…
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The order striking the first “substituted complaint” from the files could furnish no ground of appeal after the second “ substituted complaint ” had been put in. Goodrich v. Stanton, 71 Conn. 418, 424.
The latter was filed by consent, but the consent manifestly referred only to its being received after the regular time fixed by the rules of court.
It sets up a claim for money due to one Beulah Shanley, for goods sold and delivered to the defendant, and states that this claim was assigned before the bringing of the action by her to the plaintiff, in trust for her husband, of which the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
- Goodrich v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
- New York Breweries Corp. v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- Merwin v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1884
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Vinson v. GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Farley-Harvey Co. v. MaddenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Heywood v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.