Legal Opinion

Farley-Harvey Co. v. Madden

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 5, 1927PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

This action was brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County under the provisions of § 6142 of the General Statutes. The complaint alleges, with an entirely unnecessary division into counts, an indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff, a demand for payment and a refusal, and then the defendant’s concealment or removal of his personal property and his refusal to disclose his rights of action, in order to prevent their being taken by legal process. The writ, as authorized by the statute, directed an attachment of the body of the defendant, if attachable property could not be found.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hatch v. SpoffordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1852
  2. Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  3. La Croix v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1882
  4. Welles v. RhodesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1890
  5. Quinebaug Bank v. TarboxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Solomon v. AbermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  3. Dreier v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Halpern v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Beaudoin v. Town Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API