Legal Opinion

Eckert v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 16, 1984No. 3-83-180-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EARL W. SMITH, Justice.

John Eckert, in a consolidated jury trial, was adjudged guilty of the offenses of rape of a child and aggravated rape, respectively. The jury assessed punishment for rape of a child at twenty years, and for aggravated rape at sixty years. Separate appeals were perfected by each of appellant’s attorneys. Since the assignments of error arise out of the same trial occurrence, both cases are consolidated in this opinion. The judgment of the trial court in each case is affirmed.

The assignment of error in the aggravated rape case is that the trial judge’s comment on the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Wilder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Bray v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  4. Mauldin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Marks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Grant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1987
  3. Middlebrook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  4. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Morehead v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API