Legal Opinion

People v. Holmes

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1940No. Docket No. 139, Calendar No. 40,535PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Respondent was convicted of rape. At the time of the alleged offense he was 18 years of age and the prosecutrix was a few months younger. He admitted the intercourse but denied the other factors that make up the crime, that the act had been by force and against the will of the prosecutrix. Penal Code (Act No. 328, § 520, Pub. Acts 1931 [Stat. Ann. § 28.788]).

The prosecuting witness was unquestionably of good moral character. She had recently graduated from high school and had taken a temporary position in the home of respondent's aunt and uncle to assist in the household duties. The house…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strang v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People v. . LeonardiNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. People v. CowlesMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  4. State v. BurrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  5. People v. DeanMichigan Supreme Court · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People v. DegraffenreidMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. People v. SnowMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. SingletonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. CrittleMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API