Legal Opinion
Hoostein v. Mental Health Ass'n
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 13, 2015No. Civil Action No. 14-30139-MGMPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 12, 25)
MASTROIANNI, District Judge.
L Introduction
Michael Hoostein and Kathlyn Stein (“Plaintiffs”), proceeding pro se, filed a three-count complaint alleging Mental Health Association Inc. (“MHA”), Jerome Ray, the City of Northampton, and Margaret Keller (“Defendants”) discriminated and retaliated against them in violation of the Fair Housing Act (“FHA”) (Count I), engaged in unfair or deceptive acts and violations of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealings in violation of Mass. Gen. Laws § 93A (Count II),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Valerie Watterson v. Eileen PageCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Lance v. DennisSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CASA de Maryland, Inc. v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Paul Dismukes v. Brandeis UniversityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Scutt v. DorrisDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
- Scutt v. DorrisDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020