Legal Opinion

Paul Dismukes v. Brandeis University

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 26, 2019No. 1:19-cv-11049Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) JOHN DOE ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 19-11049-LTS ) BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY, et al., ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER June 26, 2019 SOROKIN, J. Now before the court is the pro se plaintiff’s amended complaint. For the reasons set forth below, summons will not issue for service of the amended complaint on defendants Flynn and Storms and the new claims are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on May 6, 2019, by filing a complaint naming as defendants…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API