Shackman v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
The merchandise in the case at bar was classified under paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, T. D. 51898, by similitude, as articles of glass, blown or partly blown in the mold, and assessed with duty at the rate of 50 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiffs claim the merchandise is properly dutiable, by similitude, as articles in chief value of cellulose acetate under paragraph 31 (a) (2), as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, at…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fensterer & Ruhe v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- Schoenemann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1903
- Rolls Razor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- United States v. NeumanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Roovers Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Ace Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- S. S. Kresge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
- National Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Theo. L. Stern & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Beauti-Vue Products Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.