Theo. L. Stern & Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Oliver, Chief Judge:
This protest relates to certain items of merchandise, identified herein as plastic angels, plastic dwarfs, and plastic elfs. They were classified, by similitude, as articles of cellulose acetate, under paragraph 31 (a) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 51802, and paragraph 1559 of the Tariff Act of 1930, with a duty assessment at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff claims that the merchandise is properly dutiable at only 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1558 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T. D. 52739, supplemented by T. D.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Shackman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marmax Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Dynamic Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Theo. L. Stern & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957