Sullenger v. Setco Northwest, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff, as conservator for her daughter Leona, appeals from a summary judgment for defendant McNeal. On review, we decide whether the pleadings and evidence present issues of fact which should have gone to the jury. Jones v. Oberg, 52 Or App 601, 628 P2d 773, rev den 291 Or 662 (1981). We conclude, as did the trial court, that the uncontroverted facts show that defendant owed no duty to plaintiffs daughter and that he was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, we affirm.
We view the facts in the record on summary judgment in the light most…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Stanfield v. LaccoarceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Cramer v. MengerhausenOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Jones v. ObergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bovara v. St. Francis HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
- Roberts v. HunterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Mead v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Cook v. School District UH3JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.