Legal Opinion

Dowell v. Mossberg

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1961PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Paul Mossberg, who is a licensed chiropractor, appeals from a judgment for Beulah Dowell, the plaintiff, following a jury trial in a malpractice action.

In April, 1954, the plaintiff heard a radio commercial inviting the public to The Basic Health Cemter, operated by the defendant. The establishment employed other chiropractors, numerous “interns”, “trainees” and “nurses” as well as other functionaries incident to the operation of a clinic. The evidence revealed that the defendant was in charge of the establishment and that all the personnel so employed *177were under his supervision and control.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Currey v. ButcherOregon Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wemett v. MountOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Eastman v. CraryOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Hotelling v. WaltherOregon Supreme Court · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Georgetown Realty, Inc. v. Home InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Securities-Intermountain, Inc. v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1980

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API