Legal Opinion
Sig Ellingson & Co. v. Butenbach
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1952No. 14576PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODROUGH, Circuit Judge.
The judgment sought to be reversed on this appeal was rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant in a case which turned upon the same considerations in the District Court that controlled its decision in DeVries v. Sig Ellingson & Co., D.C., 100 F.Supp. 781. The action was for the recovery of the stipulated value of 19 head of cattle which were sold by the defendant Sig Ellingson and Company at the South St. Paul, Minnesota, livestock market in its usual course of business as a livestock commission merchant, licensed as a market agency under the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sig Ellingson & Co. v. De VriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- De Vries v. Sig Ellingson & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. E. H. Kramel and Orr Crum, Individually, and Bowles Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Clover Creek Cattle Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1969
- John Clay & Co. Livestock Commission v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County Auction, Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Hiram Wall, D/B/A Hiram Wall Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.