Legal Opinion

John Clay & Co. Livestock Commission v. Clements

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 30, 1954No. 14809_1PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIVES, Circuit Judge.

Appellees, by separate actions, which were subsequently consolidated, sued to recover the value of 114 head of cattle allegedly converted by appellant, who sold the cattle as the property of one I. V. Moulder at the Union Stock Yards in San Antonio, Texas. The facts were largely stipulated and are clearly set forth in the district court’s memorandum findings as follows:

“The Union Stockyards at San Antonio is a stock yard as defined by Title III of the Packers & Stockyards Act of 1921, 7 U.S.C.A. § 202, 42 Stat. 163, Defendant partnership is a marketing agency, (as defined…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Birmingham v. Rice Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Lang v. RickmersTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Berlowitz v. StandleyTexas Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Sig Ellingson & Co. v. De VriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  5. Walker v. CavinessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
  2. Brumley Estate v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. United States v. E. H. Kramel and Orr Crum, Individually, and Bowles Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  4. Brumley Estate v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. SommervilleDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API