Legal Opinion
United States v. E. H. Kramel and Orr Crum, Individually, and Bowles Livestock Commission Company
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 20, 1956No. 15320_1PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by the Government against E. H. Kramel and Orr Crum, a partnership doing business as the Bowles Livestock Commission Company to recover for the conversion of a cow which they (as commission dealers) had sold on the livestock market at Kansas City, Missouri, at a time when the cow was included in a chattel mortgage held by the Farmers Home Administration, a governmental agency. Defendants’ motion to dismiss because the petition stated no cause of action was sustained, and the Government appeals.
The petition sets forth parts of the chattel mortgage (made…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Walter A. Hext, Sr., Harlingen Compress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Sandy Sommerville, Trading and Doing Business Under the Name and Style, New Wilmington Livestock AuctionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Charles E. Carson, Being the Same Person as Charles Edward Carson, and W. R. Ellis, D/B/A Ellis Livestock Commission CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
- United States v. Topeka Livestock Auction, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1975
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.