Legal Opinion
Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County Auction
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 17, 1962No. 555PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BRATTON, Circuit Judge.. These actions were to recover damages for alleged conversion of livestock. Willis Greeson instituted one of them against Boyd Adams and Western Casualty and Surety Company, and Hiram Wall instituted the other against the same defendants. The cases were tried to the court without a jury. The evidence was without substantial conflict. It disclosed these facts. Using the trade name Montgomery County Auction, Greeson was engaged in the livestock commission business at Mount Ida, Arkansas; using the trade name Hiram Wall Sales Company, Wall was engaged in a like business…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sig Ellingson & Co. v. De VriesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Eureka Springs Sales Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Pingleton v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Sig Ellingson & Co. v. ButenbachCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Willis Greeson, D/B/A Montgomery County Auction, Boyd Adams, D/B/A Boyd Adams Livestock Commission Company, and Western Casualty and Surety Company v. Hiram Wall, D/B/A Hiram Wall Sales CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962