Legal Opinion

Eads v. Spoden

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 29, 1970No. 22795PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pringle

Sally Spoden, hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, commenced a personal injury action against Deryn Eads, *233hereinafter referred to as the defendant, to recover damages incurred while riding as a passenger in defendant’s automobile. At the close of the defendant’s case, the trial judge ruled that at the time of the accident the plaintiff was not a guest under the Colorado Guest Statute (C.R.S. 1963, 13-9-1). Counsel for defendant conceded that there had been simple negligence on the part of the defendant, and the court directed a verdict against the defendant on the issue of liability. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. SugiokaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Bridges v. LintzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  3. Green v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  4. Klatka v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  5. Houghtaling v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brown v. RinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Peterson v. GrattanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  3. Hotchkiss v. PrebleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  4. Brown v. RinerWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Eads v. SpodenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API