Legal Opinion

Klatka v. Barker

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided December 24, 1951No. 16616PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Knauss

Defendants in error were plaintiffs, and plaintiff in error was defendant, in the district court, and we will refer to the parties as they there appeared, or by name.

Plaintiffs, in their complaint, alleged in substance that on October 25, 1948 defendant’s son, Earl Klatka negligently drove defendant’s automobile against another vehicle at a highway intersection; that plaintiff’s son, Gar-old B. Barker, Jr., age 14 years, was riding in the Klatka car and was killed in the accident. Plaintiffs prayed for $5,000 damages. Defendant, by answer, denied negligence; alleged that Garold B. Barker, Jr.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Scotvold v. ScotvoldSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Chaplowe v. PowsnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. Hart v. HoganWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. McGuire v. ArmstrongMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Dobbs v. SugiokaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Born v. Estate of MatznerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Truitt v. GainesDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
  3. Eberle v. HungerfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Peterson v. SnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Houghtaling v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API