Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Grattan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 22, 1978No. C-1113PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hodges

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals decision which affirmed the judgment of the trial court in entering a directed verdict for defendant in this personal injury action. The court of appeals, Peterson v. Grattan, 38 Colo. App. 206, 558 P.2d 1001 (1976), held that plaintiff was a guest within the meaning of the guest statute, section 42-9-101, C.R.S. 1973, and that no evidence was presented at trial sufficient to warrant submission of the case to the jury to decide whether or not defendant’s conduct had been wanton and wilful. In 1975, approximately two years after the date of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dobbs v. SugiokaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Klatka v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  3. Houghtaling v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  4. Baeza v. Remington Arms Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1950
  5. Eads v. SpodenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adams-Arapahoe School District No. 28-J v. Gaf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. State v. JohannesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
  3. Adams-Arapahoe School Dist. No. 28-J v. U.S. Gypsum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  4. Adams-Arapahoe School District No. 28-J v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Garcia ex rel. Garcia v. ScimemiColorado Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API