Legal Opinion
Central National Life Insurance Co. v. Peterson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 7, 1975No. 2 CA-CIV 1619PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
This case involves an application for accident and health insurance which admittedly contained incorrect answers.
The case was tried to a jury which returned a verdict in appellee’s favor in the sum of $9,776.25.
Appellant claims the court erred by not directing a verdict in its favor; in giving plaintiff’s instruction No. 10; and granting a judgment to the appellee based upon a finding that a heart attack constitutes an accidental bodily injury.
It is undisputed that when appellee applied for the insurance policy in question he signed an application representing,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Knight v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Phelps Dodge Corporation v. CabargaArizona Supreme Court · 1955
- First National Benefit Society v. FiskeArizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. Of New York v. MorairtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Howard v. Aid Ass'n for LutheransSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- In Re Certified QuestionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Hardy v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- Wickersham v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- State Compensation Fund v. Mar Pac Helicopter Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.