Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Talarico

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 14, 1936No. 13,676PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The parties to this action will he herein designated as plaintiff and the city or defendant, as they appeared in the district court. Plaintiff secured a verdict of $9,000 for damages to a crop of celery and the ground on which it grew, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence in excavating above and along a five foot pipe running to the South Platte river through a dyke, thus allowing flood waters coming down the river while the excavation was open to overflow plaintiff’s land. Judgment was entered on the verdict. The city seeks a reversal for alleged errors of law, and also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. DavisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  2. City of Denver v. RhodesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  3. City & County of Denver v. MasonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Edwards v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944
  2. Millican v. WolfeColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. City & County of Denver v. PiloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
  4. City & County of Denver v. StrafaciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  5. Edwards v. QuackenbushSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API