Legal Opinion

City & County of Denver v. Pilo

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 9, 1938No. 14,204PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Young

The parties to this action are before us in reverse order of their appearance in the trial court and will be designated herein as plaintiff, and defendant or city. Plaintiff secured a verdict of $3,870 for damages to his crops of celery, beets and turnips, and to the grounds on which they grew, alleged to have been caused by defendant’s negligence in excavating above and along a five foot pipe running into the South Platte river through a dyke, and in leaving the excavation open on Saturday afternoon with no intention of doing further work until the following Monday morning, during which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Denver v. RhodesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  2. Willson v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Stone v. . StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. City & County of Denver v. TalaricoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City & County of Denver v. StrafaciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API