Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Quackenbush

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 1, 1944No. 15,167PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE defendant in error, a young housewife, to whom we shall hereinafter refer as plaintiff, brought the action, here for review, against plaintiff in error, a physician and surgeon, hereinafter to be called defendant, and his then codefendant Dr. L. James Dixon, to recover damages in the sum of $25,000 allegedly resulting from the negligent severance of plaintiff's ileum (the lower portion of the small intestine) from the caecum (the cul-de-sac in which the large intestine begins) in the performance of an appendix operation, and negligently binding together of small loops of the small…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Rains v. RainsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
  2. McGraw v. KerrColorado Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Riss & Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Daly v. LiningerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  5. Brown v. HughesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Kitto v. GilbertColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mayer v. SampsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  3. Dunlap v. LongColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Born v. EisenmanNevada Supreme Court · 1998
  5. City of Pueblo v. RatliffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API