Legal Opinion

Amerada Hess Corp. v. Acampora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 4, 1985PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that defendants’ denial of plaintiff’s application to change the zoning classification of certain parcels of real property was “confiscatory” and “unconstitutional”, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Underwood, J.), dated March 31, 1983, which denied their motion to dismiss the complaint as time barred by the six-year Statute of Limitations contained in CPLR 213 (1).

Order affirmed, with costs.

In 1974 plaintiff, the lessee of a plot of land in the Town of Brookhaven composed of three contiguous parcels…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Solnick v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Enco Associates, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Amerada Hess Corp. v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. MacEwen v. City of New RochelleNew York Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Hampton Heights Development Corp. v. Board of Water SupplyNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Hoehmann v. Town of ClarkstownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Amerada Hess Corp. v. Town of SoutholdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. Mary K. v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API