Legal Opinion
Amerada Hess Corp. v. Town of Southold
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 3, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring, inter aha, that the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold is unconstitutional as applied to certain premises owned by the plaintiff, and that the classification of the zone in which the premises are located as a “Marine 1” district effects an unconstitutional taking of property without just compensation, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J), dated March 3, 2006, as denied those branches of its motion which were to dismiss the second through seventh affirmative defenses.
Order…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Skrodelis v. NorbergsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Warwick v. CruzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. AcamporaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Abney v. LunsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Friends of Lake Mahopac v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by3 opinions
- Butler v. CatinellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Family-Friendly Media, Inc. v. Recorder Television NetworkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Federici v. Metropolis Night Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008