Legal Opinion
MacEwen v. City of New Rochelle
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, George H., Jr., J.
In this action plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 473.) The form of action was suggested as proper by our Appellate Division in Matter of County of Westchester (MacEwen) (237 App. Div. 833), citing Dowsey v. Village of Kensington (257 N. Y. 221, 225). Her former property in the city of New Rochelle is now of the defendant county of Westchester as the result of the exercise by the latter of the power of eminent domain (Matter of County of Westchester [MacEwen], supra). At the time when title vested in the defendant county, September 27, 1929,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Zahn v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Congressional School of Aeronautics, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Amerada Hess Corp. v. AcamporaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Breland v. City of FairhopeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
- Horoshko v. Town of East HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982