Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Durkin

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 3, 1996No. 15300PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

In this appeal from the judgment of dissolution of his marriage, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found him at fault for the breakdown of the marriage, (2) ordered him to pay periodic alimony for eight years and (3) awarded the plaintiff an interest in his retirement benefits.

While the appeal was pending, the trial court issued a postjudgment order awarding the plaintiff counsel fees to defend the appeal. The defendant amended his appeal to add claims that the trial court improperly (4) failed to hold a meaningful hearing on the plaintiffs motion for appellate counsel…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Skrzypiec v. NoonanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. Krause v. KrauseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
  5. Tessitore v. TessitoreConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sachs v. SachsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. LaBossiere v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  3. Bona v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API