Legal Opinion

Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 30, 1987No. A8607-03986; CA A43239PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.

This is a tort action. Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant. The question before us is whether defendant is a “complying employer” pursuant to ORS 656.017 and, as such, immune from tort liability. ORS 656.018.

Neither party disputes these facts. Plaintiff was an employe of Aida Services, Inc. (Aida), a corporation providing temporary labor services. Pursuant to a work order, he was sent to work on defendant’s construction project. He carried a time card issued by Aida, which was filled out and signed by defendant’s representative on the job site. The card contained a “customer…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sugura v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Perry v. Express Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  3. Bliss v. Ernst Home Center, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
  4. Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API