Blacknall v. Westwood Corp., Developers & Contractors
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
This is a tort action. Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment for defendant. The question before us is whether defendant is a “complying employer” pursuant to ORS 656.017 and, as such, immune from tort liability. ORS 656.018.
Neither party disputes these facts. Plaintiff was an employe of Aida Services, Inc. (Aida), a corporation providing temporary labor services. Pursuant to a work order, he was sent to work on defendant’s construction project. He carried a time card issued by Aida, which was filled out and signed by defendant’s representative on the job site. The card contained a “customer…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Robinson v. Omark Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Sugura v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by4 opinions
- Perry v. Express Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. MarcaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Bliss v. Ernst Home Center, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 1994
- Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1998