Legal Opinion

Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill Foundation

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1998No. 20343PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WATANABE, Judge.

In this appeal, we have been asked to determine whether an employee of a temporary employment agency is precluded by Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 386-5 (1993), 1 the exclusive remedy provision of the Hawai'i Workers’ Compensation Law, from bringing a negligence action against a customer of the agency for injuries sustained while the employee was assigned to and working on the premises of the customer. The Third Circuit Court (circuit court) concluded that the employee was so barred and accordingly, granted partial summary judgment as to this issue.

We reverse the order…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Safway Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. English v. Lehigh County AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  5. Antheunisse v. Tiffany & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank v. Hawaii Planing Mill FoundationHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API