Legal Opinion

Massey Steamship Co. v. Importers & Exporters Insurance

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 28, 1922No. 22,877PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lees, C.

In 1916 plaintiff purchased the steamship Ferdinand Schlesinger, *89a wooden vessel of 2,607 tons burthen, constructed in the year 1891 and operated in the bulk freight trade upon the Great. Lakes. In the spring of 1919, plaintiff procured marine insurance upon the steamer in the amount of $80,000, of which $50,000 was hull insurance and $30,000 in the form of disbursement policies. The insurance extended for one year from April 30, 1919. The defendant is one of the insurance companies which issued the hull policies.

While on a voyage from Erie, Pennsylvania, to Port Arthur, Ontario, with…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Norton v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  2. Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
  3. Berwind v. . Greenwich Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Moores v. Louisville UnderwritersUnited States Circuit Court · 1882
  5. Hillman Transportation Co. v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Proprietors Ins. Co. v. SiegelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Glens Falls Insurance v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  3. Pacific Dredging Co. v. HurleyWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Lewis v. Aetna Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Mattson v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1948

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API